Father, Are You Proud?
I don’t often write poetry for the public, but I thought I would share this with you all. “Father Are You Proud” is a poem inspired by a friend who was never accepted by his father. The reason is open to whatever the reader decides.
Father, are you Proud?
Father, are you proud of me?
Though I’m not who I should be.
Father, are you mad at me?
For failing hopes of destiny.
–
I know I’m not the son; the man,
It is something I never can.
Please, father, can you forgive me,
For my terrible deficiency?
–
I remember your face,
When I ‘came a disgrace
The shame was clear to see.
But you needed to know me.
–
Even ‘till that day you died,
You never accepted me inside
You turned away from the truth,
Like I was something uncouth.
–
Father, did you still love me?
Wanted me to be happy?
Did you accept who I ‘came,
Although I brought you shame?
–
Now you’re gone what can I do,
Having disappointed you?
Deep inside I saw your pain,
Your smile never was the same.
–
Will you watch from above,
When I fall in love?
Will you say ‘Well done’?
Will you call me son?
–
A Grace
My New Novel – ‘Tears on the Street’
“It was the 1980’s, Thatcherism, strikes, the Cold War, and the IRA; but Tiffany’s only cares were school and boys. She’s cool and beautiful and she knows it.
That is, until her mum dies and leaves her and her kid brother, Charlie, as orphans. Suddenly she is not top dog, so they run away to Southampton and become homeless. She struggles with her new reality of raiding bins, sleeping rough and being freezing cold. The two children eventually befriend a homeless community. Izzy becomes her best friend and teaches them the ways of the street. Just as she thinks she is getting life sorted, she is kidnapped by a human trafficker and loses what little hope she still had. But then Tiffany falls in love with Tim. She must adapt to survive, unlearn her sheltered life, keep her brother safe – and hide from Tim her greatest secrets.”
The blurb for ‘Tears on the Street’ my first published novel and now available on Amazon as paperback or Kindle (link above). It is available in English in most of the world.
The story is set in the 1980s, and is about Tiffany and her brother, Charlie, who are made homeless when their mum dies, and they run away from a children’s home. They go to Southampton, UK, and Tiffany believes that she will easily get a job and home for them both. She soon realises she is wrong. They struggle to survive on the streets and meet Izzy who is part of a group of homeless people, and they teach them how to survive. Tiffany needs to balance surviving, revenge and love and hiding secrets from those around her.
The story began by watching 1980s music videos, and from there it grew and grew. I have written ten novels; this is the first to be published. My normal genre is historical works, mostly set in the Victorian era. I have also a large fantasy world created, sci-fi and horror. I wrote this novel quickly and completed it a few years ago. Then I was not confident to get it published I kept thinking about how to ‘improve it’ Finally I reached a point that I need to just get it published. Can it be improved? Maybe in years to come there are ways it can be improved. I loved writing it, loved researching the 1980s, including watching 1980s films, listening to the music and looking at the (dodgy) fashions (mullets anyone?)
I did not write it to be political, yet it does expose the horrors of homeless people and if it helps people become more sympathetic to the homeless people in Britain, then all the better. Ironically, I was a bit cold against the homeless, and by writing the novel I convinced myself that they deserve help.
Some writers do push political points, this was never my intention. I write the characters to have views in keeping with their background. Set in the 1980s, Tiffany is a middle-class teenager, and while she is not particularly political herself, she has picked up the politics of her mum and dad, which are naturally Conservative and pro- Margaret Thatcher. Many of the homeless people are against Maggie, some are Left wing, some even anarchists who disagree with the system. And I think that is OK. I do not wish to express my own personal opinion, it is not relevant, but I think it is good to have characters, even the ‘good guys’, disagree politically and with different world views. It makes the fictional world more realistic.
Tiffany begins as quite an unpleasant, confident girl, and I break her down as she realises that she is not such a big shot in the big bad world away from her comfortable upbringing. Suddenly, instead of school, she has responsibility for her brother, and later, someone else, who I will not go into (spoilers!)
With such a harsh background to the story, I included times of fun, laughter, friendship and love. Even in the most horrific circumstances, people have managed to find ways to escape, either mentally or physically.
On the matter of ‘trigger warnings’ I am not usually a fan. I think they have been over-used. However, on my Amazon page, I do have a warning. Set in the 1980s, one would expect some language to be outdated to make the characters sound authentic and their world view be more in keeping with the time. Even people who are ‘good’ would have used terms now considered offensive by some. In my first draft I went as far to have one character (not a good person!) use the N- word, but this was replaced to something less offensive as I thought it went too far.
But it was not the language or attitude that drove me to present a trigger warning. The content includes rape, sexual abuse and domestic abuse, including of young people. For me, this is enough to have a trigger warning, I am certainly not being ‘woke’ I don’t want to upset people who may have experienced horrors beyond the imagination of most of us.
Where now? Well, I am working on a two-part historical novel. It was one novel, but due to the length I have split it in two. I have also written a short story which follows Tiffany and Charlie’s dad, and two more short stories set after the events of the novel. They are stories to show what happened to many of the characters after the book. I do not intend on a ‘real’ sequel, it is not needed. Someone like James Bond has room for lots of adventures, but Tiffany’s story is that she is homeless, there is little scope to have a sequel, her story is covered in ‘Tears on the Street’. Maybe one day I’ll release the short stories around Tiffany.
If you are nostalgic for the 1980s, enjoy a good story of love, hate, revenge, deceit and struggle, then this book would be good for you. It is a coming-of-age story, a story of learning about people, finding a place in the world, finding love and friendship where you least expect it, fun, laughter and tears.
And if you do decide to get a copy of ‘Tears on the Street’, first a massive thank you, I hope you enjoy it. But also, if you could be so kind to leave a comment, it would help me so much.
Book Review: ‘Haunted’ by James Herbert
Book review ‘Haunted’
by James Herbert
Rating: 2/5
ISBN-13: 978-0330451574
First Published 1988
The book follows the simple idea of a haunted house. David Ash is a psychic investigator who uncovers fake hauntings and has doubts as to the existence of ghosts. His sceptical view stems from a dark childhood secret. He travels to Edbrook, a remote country house, to investigate a haunting and stays with the Mariell family and begins to unravel their family secret.
Ok, so I have not read James Herbert for a while as I was getting fed up with his books. I got this book cheap in a charity shop, which is the best place to get books in my opinion. Or at least until I am an author and my royalties are affected. I had an open mind. Maybe with the passing of time, I would like his books again, maybe I had just read several duff books and this would be the one to bring me back.
The blurb in the dust cover promises that ‘he has taken on the haunted-house mystery story and re-forged it in his own uniquely brilliant and terrifying way.’ Sadly, the book is different to other haunted house stories in that James Herbert uses all the themes that he uses in all of his books, as well as every theme that haunted house films and books have used ever since, well, since houses were haunted.
James Herbert has very limited characters, which was the main reason that I was alienated from his books. All of his major characters in his books are late thirties to early forties, at least in ‘feel,’ if not implicitly stated. The character is always male, heavy smoker and drinker, hiding a bad past. The first pretty female encountered WILL end up in bed with said male character. She will have little character development and be very two dimensional.
Then there is the haunted house; the book reads like a check sheet of what to include. There is the murky pond haunted by a girl, life endangered one moment, then there is no threat, the house owner hiding information about a dodgy past, crazed people hidden from others, the violent dog, the ghost detectors that are not set off, child-like giggling, seeing someone, look again and they are gone, telephones not working, the local pub knowing something dodgy happens at the big house. Ok, you get the picture; there is nothing original in here at all. We’ve seen it all before!
Then there is the mitigation. James Herbert has the skill to form the story. His words leave deep impressions and vivid images. I did keep reading it; there were interesting parts, sadly not enough, and not enough originality. The haunted house is done to death, and it would take an incredible idea to revive it, sadly, ‘Haunted’ does not deliver.
Vedict: Unoriginal and disappointing.
Book Review: ‘The Dwarves,’ by Markus Heitz
Book Review, ‘The Dwarves,’ by Markus Heitz
Published by Orbit Books
ISBN 9781841495729
Verdict: 3/5
Good read but don’t expect anything earth shattering.
‘Dwarves’ is the story of Tungdil, a dwarf brought up by human magi, unaware of his background and family. He studies books, learning about dwarves and their culture and longs to meet them himself.
After a falling out, he is sent to deliver a message, and loves the idea of seeing the wider world. As his journey continues, he discovers a magus, Nudin, has betrayed the others. When he meets with the other dwarves, he finds that they must reforge a weapon, the only way to destroy the evil that resides within Nudin.
On his quest, he is helped by a range of unusual characters, from the fabulous Rodario, an actor, to the maga, Andôkai and her companion, the enigmatic armoured giant, Djerůn. The unlikely friends travel all over Girdlegard to stop the encroachment of the Perished Land and destroy Nudin, but Tungdil must also unify groups who have their own grudges against each other as well as his own party.
So what to say? The book is long at 730 pages, which can be daunting to some people. There are other books is the same world, but this is a complete story. It puts me off when I pick up a fantasy book and see that it is book X of Y. The length takes time to explore the characters and also to explain other points of action. Despite the length, there was never any feel that the book was slowing or intentionally long. It was as long as the story needed to be.
The book ambled at a gentle pace, although I found it harder and harder to put the book down the more I read. Most of the characters I liked and felt for, even one who was whiney. As with most stories that have several characters, there were a couple I did not enjoy, and I felt that the character of Djerůn could have been developed more. It probably did no help that he was not able to talk.
So far, so good. But why only three stars? This was Markus Heitz’s first novel, and since then, he has set several more books in the same fantasy world. I do not know if he has improved, I hope so as I find his work very good. There were some down points, which hindered the story and were silly. The use of ‘orbit’ and ‘cycles’ to replace ‘day’ and ‘year’ respectively made reading at times clunky, and it did not contribute to the story in any way.
The maps at the start of the book looked as if they had been thrown together in five minutes. We are all used to the beautifully crafted maps of Tolkiens Middle Earth, the world of Game of Thrones, Games Workshops’ ‘Warhammer World’, or even the Elderscrolls maps. The map of Girdlegard is very rectangular (it was drawn of A4, I am guessing.) They show a darkened area where mountains are and name the important places that are in the novel. There are no trees to show where the forests are, no rivers, no other important places. It is easy enough to make a map with more detail, even websites for it. So a map is not the most important part of a novel, but it would have contributed more to the atmosphere of the Girdlegard world, rather than making it look cheap.
Another, albeit, minor and personal annoyance, is that the book was translated from German into American English. I know this is because the American audience is larger, but seeing ‘axe’ as ‘ax’ and ‘amour’ as ‘armor’ just gets on my wick.
Now, I come to my biggest grievance, and the reason the book does not get a better score from me. The book is a fantasy book. Let me explain; there is nothing original. Had the book been written in the 1970’s then it would have been ok, but everything in this book we have seen before. The dwarves live in great fortresses underground, they smith, love gems and gold, drink too much and hate elves. The elves live in trees, dislike dwarves and are haughty to non-elves. Every stereotype of fantasy is in the book, so it gives nothing new to fantasy. Even the plot is very contrived. A dwarf does not know his past, magical weapons to kill the bad guy, but first they have to travel far and wide to get it. A mismatched group of travellers who become friends and discover things about themselves. The orcs who don’t seem to be able to kill anything, and throw themselves at the dwarves to get slaughtered.
Would I recommend this book? Yes, but only for a reader who wants easy reading, a reader who wants basic run-of-the-mill fantasy. Would I read more of his works? Yes. As I said earlier, it is well written with good characters, and hopefully his experience would remove the negative points I have pointed out.
Book Review: ‘Backwards,’ by Rob Grant
Review of ‘Backwards’
By Rob Grant
Verdict: 4/5
Great for all ‘red Dwarf’ fans
Backwards is a book set in the ‘Red Dwarf’ universe and written by Rob Grant who, along with Doug Naylor, wrote the TV show. Maybe this helps, as he knows the characters and universe so well.
The story begins with the crew of the ‘Red Dwarf’ on a planet that runs backwards. They have to rescue Lister before he goes back so far in time, he becomes and embryo then a lot worse. From there, they fight against the psychopathic robots, the Agonoids. There is also an appearance from one of my favourite smeg heads, Ace Rimmer, much to Arnold Rimmer’s annoyance.
The original characters are neatly captured, with my mind imagining the show’s actors and voices. There are parts of several TV episodes mixed into the writing, and the same humour is very much present. When a world runs backwards, it leaves so many fun possibilities, and among the many fun scenarios mentioned in the book, sex is so much less fulfilling when it ends with the foreplay. Being a book, the author can get away with more than he could on TV, but the gross-out factor is only the worse for it, with everything being in the reader’s mind. Although this is the third in the series of ‘Red Dwarf’, reading the others is not essential as it is easy enough to follow the plot.
Sadly Cat did not have a large enough role, although what he did have was fantastic, I would say more, but I don’t want to spoil it for readers. The crew leave the backwards planet in good time, and the pace does slow and the humour fades, but even that cannot dampen this hilarious book.
‘Barefoot Soldier’ by Johnson Beharry VC
Barefoot Soldier
Johnsson Beharry VC
ISBN978-0-7515-3879-3
Published by Sphere
Verdict: 5/5 – Why haven’t you got this yet?
Some people know Johnson Gideon Beharry as the guy from ‘Dancing on Ice.’ He is, however, much more than that, being the first living recipient of the Victoria Cross in over thirty years. Personally, he is also my greatest living hero. The term ‘hero’ is used for popstars, filmstars, footballers and even reality celebs. Some of theses do have talent, but are not heroic in the way that every British soldier is, and the VC recipients are like gods among heroes.
The book ‘Barefoot Soldier’ is the autobiography of Johnson Beharry, detailing his childhood, early adulthood and the action he saw in Iraq which led to him gaining the VC. I have read the book before so I knew what to expect, and I also knew that I would enjoy it.
Ishould start with the negatives. It took me a while to think of these but I don’t want to sound like a sycophant. The book could do with an update now; I am not sure if this has happened, but since the VC, he has married, had children and been on ‘Dancing on Ice’. I would love to know more of what direction his career has now taken. After becoming a VC what does a guy do next?
That is possibly the only downside, as the book tackles the trials that Beharry went through all of his life, from an alcoholic father, a slide towards womanising and drinking to some tough times in the army. The book is not an ego trip – Beharry has character flaws as we all do, and he mentions them. He sometimes skived, he drank, he may have turned out worse had it not been for the army. He is modest, as many VC winners are; “just doing my job”.
Being written first person, it delves into Beharry’s mind, something that is missing in history books, news reports and biographies. We get to learn more of who Beharry is and what drove him on. We learn he is really a normal guy who wants a simple life and somehow became a hero.
Who is the book for? I would love everyone to read the book; we can be proud of our British armed forces and the heroes that make them up. He should inspire British children but also the poor and ethnic groups. There is a discussion in the UK about there not being enough black rôle models – here is one of the greatest black heroes I can think of (please don’t argue the point, I write, not discuss race!). Politicians should also read the book to learn about our fantastic armed forces that they seem intent on destroying.
To rate the book, I would have to give it the full marks, and recommend it to everyone and if there are any directors out there, make this into a biopic.
Book Review: “Web of Darkness” by Marion Bradley
Web of Darkness
Marion Bradley
ISBN 0-450-05855-7
Published 1983
Verdict: 1/5
Web of Darkness is the second in the Fall of Atlantis series, although it is can be a stand alone book as well. It follows the story of two sisters and the part they played in the downfall of Atlantis. The two sisters live in a temple, one is a teenage child, the other slightly older.
I had never heard of Marion Bradley, so was not aware that she had written so many books nor of her controversial sex allegations. That probably made it easier to have an open mind when I began the book.
The comments within the covers compare it to Tolkien and there are generally favourable reviews on the internet, but for me, I could not even finish it. Many books I have read which begin badly I struggle through, some improve (The White Witch) while some torture me until the bitter end. For me not to finish the book, it must have been awful. I reached page eighty, of 369 pages. In those pages nothing happened. No really, nothing at all. People walked about and talked. Some went to a temple and some talked. They even slept. And talked, although not at the same time. Inane conversations, and muttering of love and some people’s places. There was no character development, no excitement and the characters were not even interesting. I did not like the main characters, they were annoying and bland. I also did not like the names, with the main two characters, Deoris and Domaris being too similar so that I was not sure who was whom. I have read many fantasy books, and yet the names in this books seemed too ‘far out’ to understand.
At this point of slating a book, I move onto the bit I liked about the story. Um, yeah. Even the cover was not particularly inspiring.
Conclusion: Good to help the insomniacs.
Book Review: ‘Robin Hood’ by Carola Oman
Book Review:
Robin Hood
by Carola Oman
Rating: 4/5
Published By JM Dent & Sons Ltd in 1975 (originally 1949)
ISBN 0 460 02177 X
Robin Hood is one of the most famous fictional characters in the world, with his tales dating back into the middle ages. The truth and fiction is mixed up, with theories that he was based on various real people, and tales being collected and changed across the centuries. He is an English hero, among the greats of Sherlock Holmes and King Arthur.
Carola Oman’s book is not one continuous tale, but a collection of stories about Robin Hood collected together with a loose connection. Her tale begins with Sir Richard of the Lee in debt and in danger of losing his lands, where he meets Robin Hood who helps him. Sir Richard makes several more appearances throughout the novel, playing a major part. All of the other characters expected in Robin Hood tales also appear; Little John, Maid Marion, Will Scarlet and of course the wicked Sheriff of Nottingham.
The book begins with Robin already being an outlaw with his band of merry men in the forest of Sherwood. It was written for children, and takes a gentle atmosphere, full of merriment and heroism. It is a nice book, innocent and inoffensive to anyone, as to be expected for children’s books. So it is a child’s book, why did I read it? Because I enjoyed it. The character of Robin is loveable and infallible, and he is more Errol Flynn than Kevin Costner, swashbuckling his way through the baddies.
Yet it is not perfect. Sometimes the writing is dated, and the speech is almost a stereotype of medieval talk. There are parts that could have had more detail. At one point they go to the Sheriff, but it is only touched upon in a couple of lines of speech. It is a major plot point dismissed in an instant. The tension does feel lacking, probably because of this point. I would also have liked more background on Robin Hood, as I feel it started too late in his story. There are some parts of his background that leave questions open.
Verdict: Despite a few shortcomings, it is a fun take on a well used theme.
Book Review: ‘Haunted’ by James Herbert
Book review
‘Haunted’
by James Herbert
Rating: 2/5
ISBN-13: 978-0330451574
First Published 1988
The book follows the simple idea of a haunted house. David Ash is a psychic investigator who uncovers fake hauntings and has doubts as to the existence of ghosts. His sceptical view stems from a dark childhood secret. He travels to Edbrook, a remote country house, to investigate a haunting and stays with the Mariell family and begins to unravel their family secret.
Ok, so I have not read James Herbert for a while as I was getting fed up with his books. I got this book cheap in a charity shop, which is the best place to get books in my opinion. Or at least until I am an author and my royalties are affected. I had an open mind. Maybe with the passing of time, I would like his books again, maybe I had just read several duff books and this would be the one to bring me back.
The blurb in the dust cover promises that ‘he has taken on the haunted-house mystery story and re-forged it in his own uniquely brilliant and terrifying way.’ Sadly, the book is different to other haunted house stories in that James Herbert uses all the themes that he uses in all of his books, as well as every theme that haunted house films and books have used since, well, since houses were haunted.
James Herbert has very limited characters, which was the main reason that I was alienated from his books. All of his major characters in his books are late thirties to early forties, at least in ‘feel,’ if not implicitly stated. The character is always male, heavy smoker and drinker, hiding a bad past. The first pretty female encountered WILL end up in bed with said male character. She will have little character development and be very two dimensional.
Then there is the haunted house; it is like a check sheet of what to include. Murky pond haunted by a girl, having life-threatening experiences happen, then suddenly they are not. The house owner hiding information about a dodgy past to the hero, crazed people hidden from others, the violent dog, the ghost detectors that are not set off, child-like giggling, seeing someone, look again and they are gone. Telephones not working, the local pub knowing something dodgy happens at the big house. Ok, you get the picture; there is nothing original in here at all. We’ve seen it all before!
Then there is the mitigation. James Herbert has the skill to form the story. He does not resort to mindless bloodshed, bludgeoning his readers over the head to force the point that this is horror; he molds the words to be psychologically horrific. His words leave deep impressions and vivid images. I did keep reading it; there were interesting parts, sadly not enough, and not enough originality. The haunted house is done to death, and it would take an incredible idea to revive it. Sadly, ‘Haunted’ does not deliver.
Vedict: Unoriginal and disappointing.
